<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: Microsoft Acquisition of Yahoo would be “Bad for the Internet”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainmagnate.com/2008/03/19/google-microsoft-acquisition-of-yahoo-would-be-%e2%80%9cbad-for-the-internet%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainmagnate.com/2008/03/19/google-microsoft-acquisition-of-yahoo-would-be-%e2%80%9cbad-for-the-internet%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Making Money in Domaining The Safe Way</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mason Shoe</title>
		<link>http://www.domainmagnate.com/2008/03/19/google-microsoft-acquisition-of-yahoo-would-be-%e2%80%9cbad-for-the-internet%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Mason Shoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainmagnate.com/2008/03/19/google-microsoft-acquisition-of-yahoo-would-be-%e2%80%9cbad-for-the-internet%e2%80%9d/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Microsoft already has their own search engine at msn.com and yahoo (as well as google) are competitors. Microsoft is only trying to weed down the competition. Yahoo executives want their golden parachute and look for "other" executive positions. Its a big payout for executives who own stock in the company. Its monopolistic for Microsoft to own Yahoo... opps... thats the magic word... monopoly... with government involved, I can only see one thing happening with the yahoo acquisition.... pre-approved
and Google isn't perfect. They do a lot of little sneaky things. Like trying to put that toolbar in about every freaking piece of software you download these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft already has their own search engine at msn.com and yahoo (as well as google) are competitors. Microsoft is only trying to weed down the competition. Yahoo executives want their golden parachute and look for &#8220;other&#8221; executive positions. Its a big payout for executives who own stock in the company. Its monopolistic for Microsoft to own Yahoo&#8230; opps&#8230; thats the magic word&#8230; monopoly&#8230; with government involved, I can only see one thing happening with the yahoo acquisition&#8230;. pre-approved<br />
and Google isn&#8217;t perfect. They do a lot of little sneaky things. Like trying to put that toolbar in about every freaking piece of software you download these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.domainmagnate.com/2008/03/19/google-microsoft-acquisition-of-yahoo-would-be-%e2%80%9cbad-for-the-internet%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainmagnate.com/2008/03/19/google-microsoft-acquisition-of-yahoo-would-be-%e2%80%9cbad-for-the-internet%e2%80%9d/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer pledged earlier this month that his company would gain market share against Google in online advertising and Web searching, even if led to his “last breath” at the company - what an IGNORANT B**tard this guy Steve B. is from Mikersoft.

Other wise this is a GREAT read</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer pledged earlier this month that his company would gain market share against Google in online advertising and Web searching, even if led to his “last breath” at the company - what an IGNORANT B**tard this guy Steve B. is from Mikersoft.</p>
<p>Other wise this is a GREAT read</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
